Proofs that the primes never run out: a maths EPQ idea
A title to start from
Which proof that there are infinitely many primes is the most powerful, and why?
Why it works as an EPQ
Several short, genuinely different proofs exist, so you can compare them against criteria you choose (length, what else each proves, how far each generalises). That comparison is the judgement an EPQ needs.
Scope and difficulty
Accessible. Very manageable. Keep to three or four proofs and one extension, such as primes of the form 4k + 3.
The maths
Builds on these A Level topics: Proof · Sequences and series.
You would learn:
- Modular arithmetic
- Pairwise coprime sequences (Fermat numbers)
- Why the harmonic series diverges
One possible plan
- Explain Euclid's argument carefully, including the common misreading of it.
- Work through a second proof using Fermat numbers, and a third using the divergence of a series.
- Set your criteria for 'powerful' and judge each proof against them.
- Use one proof to show there are infinitely many primes of the form 4k + 3.
Pitfalls
- Claiming that the product of the first n primes plus 1 is always prime: 2 × 3 × 5 × 7 × 11 × 13 + 1 = 30031 = 59 × 509.
- Listing proofs without ever comparing them.
Where to start reading
- Proofs from THE BOOK (Aigner and Ziegler), the chapter on primes
- Search for: Fermat numbers coprime proof infinitude of primes
Similar ideas
- Proving numbers are irrationalHow far can proof by contradiction take us in showing that numbers are irrational?
- Fermat's Last Theorem for n = 4Why can Fermat's Last Theorem be proved for n = 4 with school mathematics when the general case took over 350 years?
- Are some infinities bigger than others?Are some infinities bigger than others, and how convincing is Cantor's argument?
- Why mathematicians accepted imaginary numbersWhy did mathematicians come to accept imaginary numbers, and what can they do that real numbers cannot?
All pure maths ideas · all 93 ideas
Your EPQ must be your own work. These pages coach: ideas, structure, checklists and planning. Submitting text, proofs, code or analysis written by someone else or by an AI tool as your own is malpractice. How to use help and AI honestly.