Skip to main content

How to reference sources in a maths EPQ

Cite every idea, result, proof, data set, diagram or piece of software that is not your own, where you use it and again in a list at the end. Use one style consistently (your school may name one).

The rules that matter

What to record

SourceRecord
BookAuthor, year, title, edition, publisher, pages used.
Journal articleAuthor, year, title, journal, volume, pages, DOI or link.
Lecture notesAuthor, year, title, course and university, link, date accessed.
Data setOrganisation, year, title, link, date accessed, any filtering you did.
Software or codeName, version, maker, link, and what you used it for.
AI toolName, date, what you asked, what you used, and a screenshot kept as your school requires.

Citing a proof you rewrote

Explaining a proof in your own words is exactly what a maths EPQ needs, but the idea is still someone else's. One sentence, such as "the proof below follows [source], with the steps expanded", protects you and shows the marker what is yours.

Frequently asked questions

Which referencing style should I use for my EPQ?

Any recognised style, used consistently, unless your school names one. Harvard is a common choice.

Do I need to reference Desmos, GeoGebra or Python?

Yes: name the software and what you used it for. You still need to explain the maths behind any output.

Your EPQ must be your own work. These pages coach: ideas, structure, checklists and planning. Submitting text, proofs, code or analysis written by someone else or by an AI tool as your own is malpractice. How to use help and AI honestly.

The Extended Project Qualification is offered by several awarding bodies, including AQA, Pearson Edexcel, OCR and WJEC/Eduqas. A Level Math Revision is independent and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any awarding body or university. Summaries of the rules are in our own words: your school and your board's specification have the final say. Every idea here is our own.