Is the golden ratio really everywhere?: a maths EPQ idea
A title to start from
Is the golden ratio really found throughout nature and art, or is it a mathematical myth?
Why it works as an EPQ
You can derive the golden ratio properly and then test popular claims with your own measurements, so the conclusion rests on evidence.
Scope and difficulty
Accessible. Accessible. Keep the testing to one or two claims with careful measurement and error bounds.
The maths
Builds on these A Level topics: Sequences and series · Algebra and functions · Sampling and data.
You would learn:
- Limits of ratios of Fibonacci numbers
- Measurement error and tolerance
- Continued fractions (optional)
One possible plan
- Derive φ from x² = x + 1 and show the ratio of consecutive Fibonacci numbers tends to it.
- Collect claims (spirals, faces, buildings, paintings) and decide how each could be tested.
- Measure a sample, say what tolerance counts as 'golden', and justify it.
- Conclude which claims survive and why so many do not.
Pitfalls
- Choosing the tolerance after seeing the data.
- Treating any ratio near 1.6 as evidence.
Where to start reading
- Misconceptions about the Golden Ratio (George Markowsky, College Mathematics Journal, 1992)
- The Golden Ratio (Mario Livio)
Making something? Read the artefact guide first: an artefact still needs a research-based written report.
Similar ideas
- When does iteration converge?When does the iteration xₙ₊₁ = g(xₙ) converge to a root, and how can the speed of convergence be predicted?
- What makes e the natural base?What makes e the 'natural' base for exponentials and logarithms?
- The four colour theorem and computer proofWhy was the computer-assisted proof of the four colour theorem controversial, and should it be trusted?
- From the pigeonhole principle to Ramsey numbersHow far can the pigeonhole principle take us, from simple puzzles to Ramsey numbers?
All pure maths ideas · all 93 ideas
Your EPQ must be your own work. These pages coach: ideas, structure, checklists and planning. Submitting text, proofs, code or analysis written by someone else or by an AI tool as your own is malpractice. How to use help and AI honestly.